In this episode, we speak with Ward 13 Council Member Linea Palmisano on the contentious budget process that saw the mayor’s veto overridden and over 70 amendments proposed. From the community-driven capital project planning to the complex interplay of taxation and downtown property values, this discussion sheds light on the fiscal challenges facing Minneapolis. Linea critiques last-minute budget amendments for their potential long-term impact on city services and highlights the difficult transition away from federal relief funds. With important lessons for the future, this episode is a must-listen for those invested in Minneapolis’s governance and financial health.
If you experience any difficulties accessing the podcast, please let us know. If you prefer to read a transcript, simply click the button located above the photo.
The podcast discussion covered four main points:
Budget Process and Participatory Governance: Linea Palmisano discussed the year-round budget process, emphasizing the involvement of community members through the Capital Long-Range Improvement Committee (CLIC). This body — comprised of 26 council and 7 mayoral appointees — reviews and prioritizes capital projects before recommendations are made to the mayor.
City Finances and Taxation: The conversation explored the complexities of Minneapolis’s financial management, including the role of property taxes and the implications of budgetary shortfalls. Particular attention was given to the impact of downtown commercial property valuations on the tax burden for other areas.
Controversial Budget Amendments: There was significant debate over last-minute budget amendments, their impact on city services, and the reallocation of funds for new projects. Palmisano expressed concerns about long-term structural balance and the political motivations behind some council decisions.
Future Challenges and Strategic Adjustments: The transition from federal relief funds (ARPA) was highlighted as a major challenge, with implications for maintaining services and addressing fiscal responsibility. The need for smarter budgeting and priority adjustments was emphasized.
Keeping up with all the changes can be challenging. Since this interview, we’ve learned that the mayor has vetoed the City Council’s decision to deny cost-of-living adjustments for 163 appointed city employees. This marks his third veto of the month, ensuring that 2025 will begin much like 2024 ended — with controversy surrounding the budget.
According to Mayor Frey, “By withholding cost of living adjustments, prospective employees will be less inclined to work for the city.”
We encourage you to visit Minneapolistimes.com to read our story, “Budget Mania: Wrapping Up the Year with Speed Budgeting.”
Share this post